The comparison between the iPod nano and the discontinued iPod mini was inevitable, and CNET was not the only one to make it. Here’s PlayListMag.com: “The second-generation iPod nano is both a welcome step back to the more colorful (and scratch-resistant) days of the iPod mini and a moderate step forward in functionality. This middle-child iPod feels and looks great with its rugged aluminum finish and bright display.”
mp3.com were slightly more refined than their competitors, instead taking a rather neutral ground in their review: “The 2G Nano doesn’t really bring anything new to the table in the fast-advancing world of MP3 players, but the improvements over the original are certainly welcome.”. Also slightly less overwhelmed was PC Magazine, who pointed out minor problems with loud volumes: “the sound quality is very good until you push the volume near the limit”, but they weren’t about to take the wind from Apple’s sails: “When all is said and done, the second-gen iPod nano is an excellent product. It is slim, attractive, sturdy, and easy to use, not to mention the excellent integration with iTunes.”
Overall, most of the reviews of the new second generation Apple iPod Nano have been exactly the way Steve Jobs would have hoped, but the world has forgotten its initial love affair with the iPod nano and this time round is not afraid to come out and criticise its shortcomings. This is a market that now has alternatives, and if you are looking for an MP3 player the iPod nano isn’t necessarily the only or best option available to you.